Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 03:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4900-$42
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 89.8
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 153
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 184
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 381 166 39 36 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 486
Write 345
Mixed 359
SusWrite 168
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 27.3
131% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 49.4
102% 203 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 95%
USB 320GB
115GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 86
Write 91.2
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 64.7
50% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 13.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback