Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 00:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 443
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 65.7
62% 73.4 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 73.9
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 817 849 811 817 813 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,087
Write 1733
Mixed 1,373
SusWrite 812
335% 1,501 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 66.9
216% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,376
1,023% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 261%
Great: 346%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
4GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 76 55 54 96 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 384
Write 58.8
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 66.5
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 8.6
62% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 34.3
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 153 124 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 141
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 153E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 132 133 137 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 66.9
Write 113
Mixed 58
SusWrite 135
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 859B BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBR2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback