Lenovo 10AY001SUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AY001SUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 19:58
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 177
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 266
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.78
4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 194 193 189 189 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 420
Mixed 330
SusWrite 204
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 45.9
151% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 222
191% 284 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback