Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 793
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 116
Parallax 257
115% 171 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 135
Splatting 160
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 76 79 74 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 428
Write 263
Mixed 206
SusWrite 82.2
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 29
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 80.8
81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 114%
Emte X150 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: H190
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 456 441 431 430 428 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 421
Mixed 348
SusWrite 436
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 41.9
134% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 245
183% 241 MB/s
WD WD5000AACS-00G8B 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.7
Write 74.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 79.7
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2856 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 30.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 30.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback