Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 03:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 239
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 591
66% 516 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
PNY(196E 109A) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.87
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 9.62
7% 9 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 178 178 177 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 458
Write 166
Mixed 182
SusWrite 176
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 13.1
111% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 76.1
83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
666GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 177 181 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 200
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 183
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback