Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 23:37
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 540
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.9
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 416 413 408 411 411 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 430
Mixed 375
SusWrite 414
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 41.2
140% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
221GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 396 393 390 390 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 450
Mixed 326
SusWrite 396
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 31.6
108% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 149
166% 283 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 116%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
514GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 83.5
Write 75.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 69.6
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
674GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 73 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 132
Write 105
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 73.3
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 76%
Adaptec Array 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 158 158 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 212
Mixed 119
SusWrite 158
130% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.1
362% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Adaptec Array 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 188 189 190 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 175
Mixed 112
SusWrite 189
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2
347% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
3.5TB free, PID ab34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 159 153 157 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 63
SusWrite 156
147% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
274% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback