bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 500
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 362 349 360 361 361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 382
Write 368
Mixed 312
SusWrite 358
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 38.5
127% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 55.6
48% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
793GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 191 189 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 157
Mixed 103
SusWrite 190
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 32GB
25GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 10 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 12.8
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 10.3
23% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.7
223% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3132383030434C392D344742584C 0xCD04 0x46332D3132383030434C392D344742584C 0xCD04 0x46332D3132383030434C392D344742584C 0xCD04 0x46332D3132383030434C392D344742584C 0xCD04 0x46332D3137303030434C31312D34474258 0xCD04 0x46332D3137303... 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 32.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback