Asus UX32VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 39% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus UX32VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32VD
Memory3.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130129
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 39%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 36.1
30% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 43.9
8-Core 44.6
6% 44.2 Pts
64-Core 46.6
3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1507) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.13
4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 370 366 369 365 370 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32VD Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback