Asrock B85M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 147
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 165
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 35.7
32% 35.1 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 36.9
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 75 83 78 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 308
Write 242
Mixed 165
SusWrite 71
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 17.9
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 19.2
18% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 75 85 80 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 73.2
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-HDS Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback