Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 13:34
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 30.2
22% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 30.4
8-Core 30.1
4% 30.2 Pts
64-Core 30.6
2% 30.6 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.1000
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.74 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X1 50 240GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 180 236 180 360 369 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 11% Great: 106%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 8 7.8 7.7 9.9 9.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15
Write 5.7
SusWrite 8.7
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 5
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback