Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3500+-$54 480 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 29 32% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 31.3 8-Core 31.2 4% 31.2 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1900 170 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 0B12) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.31 2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 13 16 21 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.62% Terrible	Read 4.3 Write 5.4 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 15.2 6% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 5.62% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x0.5GB 2,291 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.4 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16