EVGA 141-BL-E757

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 141-BL-E757  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 03:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 96.6
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 198
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 488
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 26.6
20% 29.2 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 27.6
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 233
Write 104
Mixed 82
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 7.6
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 36.3
36% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
200GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 84
Write 79
Mixed 64
SusWrite 61.2
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 141-BL-E757 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 141-BL-E757

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback