MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 11:25
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 287
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 860
86% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 104
92% 77.4 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
88% 107 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M Series NVMe SSD 256G 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 1066 1038 147 97 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,619
Write 1,123
Mixed 1,022
SusWrite 588
242% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 48.3
240% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 544
508% 777 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 212%
Great: 252%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
401GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 103 119 273 271 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 449
Write 323
Mixed 286
SusWrite 234
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 19
63% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 42
49% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
383GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 178 106 128 126 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 447
Write 374
Mixed 283
SusWrite 182
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 19.1
79% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 41.9
49% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 286 285 292 291 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 482
Mixed 423
SusWrite 306
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.1
196% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 111 111 111 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 110
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 39.7
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $543
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback