Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Master SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 00:02
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 918
81% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 91
61% 78.3 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 58.4
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 657 656 655 660 660 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 1,553
Mixed 944
SusWrite 693
287% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.3
226% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 297
224% 299 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 205%
Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
167GB free
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 584 590 597 600 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 720
Write 600
Mixed 562
SusWrite 589
139% 618 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 57.9
190% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 200
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 133%
Great: 259%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 149 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 166
Mixed 90
SusWrite 148
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 173 173 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 163
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 172
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 112 111 109 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 111
116% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 28.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Master SLI/ac Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $679
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback