MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A93
MotherboardMSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 20:40
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 745
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 52.8
32% 46.4 fps
MRender 49.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 40.9
35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 49%
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 198
Parallax 189
145% 188 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 191
Splatting 146
127% 156 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 131%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 627 637 631 629 632 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1958
Write 1,654
Mixed 812
SusWrite 672
283% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 41.8
204% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 973
780% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 231%
Great: 254%
Techman XC100E5C-3200 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1050 1038 1042 1040 1059 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 660
Write 1,022
Mixed 554
SusWrite 1,044
186% 820 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 37.7
180% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1406
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,263
943% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 199%
Great: 212%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
199GB free
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 423 424 398 413 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 430
Mixed 256
SusWrite 418
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 30.7
125% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 49.8
105% 211 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 100%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 90 92 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 84.2
Mixed 74
SusWrite 90.1
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 49.3
MC Mixed 24.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93) Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback