PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation 690 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0F9394 |
Memory | 21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080425 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '20 at 18:13 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz
Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 206 155 90 161 92 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 640GB
594GB free
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 205 208 209 209 209 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
186GB free
Firmware: 2D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
8.62%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 6x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |