MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 10:33
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 749
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 90.7
59% 78.7 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 58.9
55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2173 863 811 811 818 819 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 2,369
Mixed 1,907
SusWrite 1,049
440% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 89
290% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 786
593% 796 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 291%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
217GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1242 379 308 307 308 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1,239
Mixed 979
SusWrite 475
233% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 79.4
262% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 859
645% 862 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 208%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 474 471 479 434 357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 476
Mixed 441
SusWrite 449
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 58.2
190% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
224GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 101
Mixed 68
SusWrite 98.5
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 116 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 104
Write 97.5
Mixed 67
SusWrite 118
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.5
449% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.2
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 103
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 32.7
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback