Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 05:55
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 897
82% 686 Pts
64-Core 1248
77% 1248 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
EVGA(3842 2063) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 109
Parallax 100
91% 107 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 83.2
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$149
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1023 1277 1475 1556 1625 1565 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 1,587
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1,420
366% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.9
245% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 876
660% 885 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 299%
Great: 322%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 256GB
9GB free
Firmware: EXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 280
Mixed 298
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 28.3
91% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 133
113% 161 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 334 326 326 325 323 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 467
Write 457
Mixed 436
SusWrite 334
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 29.9
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 162
141% 201 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid Array 3 599GB
558GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 228 230 231 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 233
Mixed 129
SusWrite 229
149% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 1.3
318% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 137 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 111
SusWrite 137
173% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
1TB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42% Average
Read 99.7
Write 101
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 100
122% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback