MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 743
71% 589 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 116
Parallax 110
91% 113 fps
MRender 99.7
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 1286 796 608 604 606 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1508
Mixed 652
SusWrite 794
247% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 58.2
230% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 925
748% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
460GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 432 462 465 464 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 439
Mixed 398
SusWrite 424
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59.7
206% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 307
246% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
337GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 437 462 466 465 467 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 424
Mixed 304
SusWrite 433
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 43.7
168% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 180
156% 223 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
777GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 621 422 419 420 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 1,622
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 652
275% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 78.4
297% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1270
DQ Write 1,303
DQ Mixed 1,139
897% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 243%
Great: 250%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 23 35 59 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 120
Write 10.3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 48.5
47% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 32.4
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 31.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback