Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 06:15
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 130
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 447
41% 346 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Palit(1569 1187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.02
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 41.7
25% 34 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 32.8
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,162
Write 975
Mixed 495
194% 877 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 37.4
129% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 314
234% 311 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
290GB free
Firmware: CC29
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 123
Mixed 79.3
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
587GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.4
Write 105
Mixed 73.3
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
560GB free
Firmware: CC27
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 169
Write 134
Mixed 75.6
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
281GB free
Firmware: CP100-11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.1
Write 76.1
Mixed 50.1
51% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 DDR3 1600 Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback