Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 22:33
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 273
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 550
73% 549 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3716) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 254
Parallax 281
170% 248 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 236
Splatting 141
174% 224 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 288 287 288 288 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 718
Write 602
Mixed 617
SusWrite 286
124% 556 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 84
282% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 713
527% 696 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 165%
Great: 393%
512g SSD 512GB
185GB free
Firmware: P100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 128 127 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.8% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 420
Mixed 334
SusWrite 126
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 50.9
172% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 204
169% 242 MB/s
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
229GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 127 127 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 442
Write 333
Mixed 282
SusWrite 129
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.4
154% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 182
153% 217 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 97%
WD WD30EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
819GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 108 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 124
Write 71.5
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 109
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1800 MHz clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $920
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback