MSI B450M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 692
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 269 271 264 266 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,254
Write 804
Mixed 667
SusWrite 269
166% 749 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 31.3
141% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 65.5
132% 267 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 125%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
423GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 146 147 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 152
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 144
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 28 27 29 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 94
Write 25
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 26.7
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 39.1
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 119%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback