Asus PRIME B360M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360M-A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 00:03
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 967
95% 776 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 12
Parallax 8.66
6% 9.14 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 16.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1944 2006 1627 1543 1553 1194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 1,982
Mixed 1,289
SusWrite 1,644
415% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 85.1
279% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,343
DQ Mixed 1,445
1,087% 1,456 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 352%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
165GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 71.1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 60.5
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
345GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 88
Write 87.9
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 87.6
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 169 170 169 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 137
Mixed 82
SusWrite 167
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 99%
WDC WD10 JPVT-00A1YT0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 112
138% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-018.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 11.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360M-A Builds (Compare 7,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-A - $495

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback