PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus VANGUARD B85 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140818 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 15:46 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.2
|
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 144 150 152 150 120 MB/s
|
76.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
739GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 168 168 171 170 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
333GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 155 160 158 154 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
412GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 178 178 180 182 181 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KM9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 76x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 47x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 34x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 25x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $7,991 |