Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 23:42
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 74
48% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 85.7
8-Core 85.8
11% 85.8 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS
Device(107D 2AB2) 320MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 2
5% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 5.17
4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 60GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MB3OC60R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 31 29 32 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 31.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 29.9
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
HTS54802 0M9AT00 20GB
15GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 13.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 13.7
18% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 9JSF12872AZ-1 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback