ADD TO PC
BUILD

Jumper EZbook

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Jumper EZbook (all builds)
Motherboard	Jumper EZbook
Memory	2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180201
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 39.1 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 84.9 33% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 163 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 2.25 2% 2.18 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1121A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 322 99 86 69 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 28.9 Write 307 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 157 32% 139 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 9.1 52% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 26 49% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 88%
Adplus SuperVer 160GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 147GB free Firmware: 6302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 66.7 Write 26.9 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 26.7 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%
SDXC Card 129GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 21.1 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 18.4 27% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 33% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x3GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical EZbook Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Jumper EZbook

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	4x
NT-128 128GBBench 60%, 1,116 samples	4x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	21x
123456789012345678 2x3GBABCDBench 22%, 487 samples	11x
4x1.5GBUnknownBench 26%, 444 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback