HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 819
80% 654 Pts
64-Core 1070
66% 1070 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 20.3
16% 18.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 20.2
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 690 662 639 465 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 684
Mixed 444
SusWrite 588
154% 691 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 45.4
174% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 585
476% 670 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 163%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 28.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback