Asrock P67 Professional

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Professional  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 04 '15 at 07:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
78% 172 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 652
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 71
51% 63.6 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 54.7
49% 61 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDCR120GB-MX 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 305
Write 138
Mixed 165
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 12.8
80% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 12.2
25% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 96.1
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.29
90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
336GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 74
Write 71.6
Mixed 23.8
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.34
106% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 45%
Typical P67 Professional Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $597
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback