Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 19:12
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 451
60% 452 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 0
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 57.6
0% 36.4 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 43.5
37% 45.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Trust HDD 2.5" 640GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 52 55 56 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 52.8
37% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334532202020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback