Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	70%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 95.8 52% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 240 37% 267 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.8% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 24.6 21% 23.6 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 27.1 Splatting 25 21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 161 246 149 147 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 353 Write 386 Mixed 257 SusWrite 170 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 29.8 113% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 271 196% 253 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 148GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 164 Mixed 32.8 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$45 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 12.4 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	393x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	384x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	354x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	401x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	349x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	116x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16