Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 07:29
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 216
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 438
52% 404 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 260 265 267 264 267 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 451
Mixed 380
SusWrite 263
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 44.7
152% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
193GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 185 187 186 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.7% Very good
Read 262
Write 251
Mixed 237
SusWrite 184
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 39.5
132% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 146
124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
158GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 253 255 259 257 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 467
Mixed 351
SusWrite 256
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 41.8
144% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 174
178% 292 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
894GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 179 181 183 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 156
Mixed 85
SusWrite 179
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 125 125 123 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 85
SusWrite 123
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 84%
Samsung SSD 840 PRO Seri 512GB
471GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 115 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 122
SusWrite 114
166% 122 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 20.5
1,615% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 24.1
1,996% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 125%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 39.4
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback