HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory34.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩, , 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 124
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 373
37% 301 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 1TB
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 400 396 402 399 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 429
Write 378
Mixed 335
SusWrite 400
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 18.1
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 35.7
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 99%
Sm2263xt 512GB 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: S0107A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 288 288 290 290 290 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.6% Good
Read 351
Write 58.1
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 289
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 12.1
69% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 69.1
111% 217 MB/s
WD WD1001FYYG-01SL3 1TB
636GB free
Firmware: VR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 161
Write 42.8
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 43.2
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-144.A00LF Transcend TS512MLK72V6N 9965525-144.A00LF 9965525-144.A00LF Transcend TS512MLK72V6N 9965525-144.A00LF 40GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback