TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TP401NA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TP401NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP401NA
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 39.7
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 96.3
35% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 119
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 30.4%
 Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1C80) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.84
1% 1.96 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.62%
 Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 351
Mixed 285
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 32.2
110% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 189
151% 212 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 26.5%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TP401NA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP401NA

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples5x
GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples5x
SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples2x
ESD-S1C 1TBROGBench 77%, 536 samples1x
SD8SN8U256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 4,445 samples1x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback