Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 121
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 363
35% 289 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 200
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 1002 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.00.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.3% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 51.5
Parallax 59.5
42% 54.2 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 37.1
37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 54 67 49 65 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 215
Write 30
Mixed 224
SusWrite 67.3
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 20.6
102% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
34% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 78%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 138 138 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 157
Write 130
Mixed 114
SusWrite 137
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
845GB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 27.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 18.5
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 108%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB
7GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 27
Write 21
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 11.8
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
122% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 22%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
7GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 24
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 1.5
19% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
68% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback