HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory20.3 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 121
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 279
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.5
6% 7.71 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.88 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 153 148 156 152 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 217
Write 212
Mixed 223
SusWrite 148
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 33.2
110% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 193
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 57 58 72 78 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 95
Write 80
Mixed 52
SusWrite 64.5
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
299GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 102 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 114
Write 103
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 101
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 115 112 116 115 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 110
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 83 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 90.4
Write 74.4
Mixed 37
SusWrite 81.1
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 88%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 4GB
2GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
8.18% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 11.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 10.7
16% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
92% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 14.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback