Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 124 47% 79.5 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 155 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 68 65 63 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 70.4 Write 72.3 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 64.3 48% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.8 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	28x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	1x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $230