Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130204
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 137 62% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 418 41% 333 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 22B6) 2GB CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Lighting 44.5 Reflection 49.8 Parallax 53.7 36% 49.3 fps	MRender 49.9 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 36.3 34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 152 168 171 157 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 462 Write 407 Mixed 352 SusWrite 188 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 45.7 150% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 253GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 86 85 88 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 80.8 Write 82 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 85.9 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 74%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 558GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 111 110 110 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 98 SusWrite 110 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 85%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB 4,921 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 245GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 25.5 30% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.3 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB 2,652 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 17 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 12.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	186x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	81x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	57x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	45x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369