MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 23:47
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 126
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 386
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 35.8
25% 31.6 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 37
Splatting 32
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 60GB-$56
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 109 113 113 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 368
Write 133
Mixed 177
SusWrite 111
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 30.8
107% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 113
88% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MK3263GSXN 320GB
94GB free
Firmware: GC002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 31 30 27 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 58.8
Write 60.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 28.7
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 38%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
73GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 127 126 128 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
41GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 48 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 40.4
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 49.7
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback