Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '20 at 16:33
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Memory 83 1-Core 154 2-Core 304 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,018 98% 809 Pts	64-Core 1,448 90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FE0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Lighting 95.3 Reflection 86 Parallax 81.7 78% 87.7 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 78.5 Splatting 76.3 62% 75 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53 30,265 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 295 211 216 208 216 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 819 Write 797 Mixed 314 SusWrite 229 120% 540 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 28.2 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 399 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 230 176% 247 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 141%
Seagate STM31000528AS 1TB 1,142 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 529GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 87 92 89 93 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 95 Write 82.3 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 88.8 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 68%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 473GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 144 145 140 139 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 141 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 107%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 551GB free Firmware: 1306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 40 41 39 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 34.8 Write 39 Mixed 31 SusWrite 39.7 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 59%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 116 123 118 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 96.7 Write 128 Mixed 87 SusWrite 116 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 156% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 64%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 43GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 213 Write 30.3 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 24.5 76% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 9.7 782% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 11.1 774% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 112%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 469GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 83 81 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 84.5 Write 58.8 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 82.1 89% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GB 12,037 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 32 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 32.6 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	885x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	631x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	462x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	285x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	254x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	241x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	106x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	106x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	222x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $451

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16