Toshiba SATELLITE S50D-A-10J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE S50D-A-10J  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD VG10AD
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 36
2-Core 65.2
37% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 114
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual Graphics
Toshiba(1179 FA44) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 5.53
5% 6.02 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 6.7
4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 108 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 111
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback