Intel SHARKBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel SHARKBAY  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 03:19
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 175
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 258
35% 260 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
EVGA(3842 2754) 2GB
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 14.9
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 18.1
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.3
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S400-240 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180731
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 80 41 20 20 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 278
Write 90.5
Mixed 120
SusWrite 50.2
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 23.7
90% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 23.9
20% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 97%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
69GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 39 39 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 47.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 37.7
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.1 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 6
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 5.1
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.9
87% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback