Asus TP501UAK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TP501UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP501UAK
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 04:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 142
55% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 243
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.12 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 78 79 56 48 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 78.1
Write 69.4
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 67.5
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 62%
SDHC Card 4GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 6.7
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
WDC WD32 00BUCT-63TWB 320GB
135GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 31 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 30.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 34.4
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP501UAK Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP501UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback