Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 122
61% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 173
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 397 429 383 311 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 449
Write 412
Mixed 327
SusWrite 360
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 28.1
93% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 226
184% 265 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-063.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback