Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 18:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 802
80% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 87.3
53% 72.4 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 53.5
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb QLC SATA SSD 512GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 15 32 18 64 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 501
Write 387
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 90.3
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
13% 34 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 202 216 220 218 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 84.8
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 214
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1f00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.4 7.5 7.3 7.3 7.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 16
Write 5.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 7.3
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 36.2
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback