Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '17 at 15:26
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130 12,547 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 133 56% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 217 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Sapphire(174B A003) CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 49.4 33% 40 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 37.4 29% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 11083184 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 81217831567995 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 201 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 63 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 46 68722491417 (C2) HDA temperature 25 46 68722491417 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11083184 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11083184 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11083184 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98784247808 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1820 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1760 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1760 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2140 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1114118	54.2% Above average	Read 255 Write 214 Mixed 223 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 16.7 84% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 20.8 47% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 107 (03) Spinup time 116 116 8631026287 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1714 (05) Reallocated sector count 73 73 649 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2764 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 818 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1723 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1723 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 270583791648 (C4) Reallocation count 74 74 652 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 18 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 52833	60.5% Good	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 93.1 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.34 85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 114GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 47 142522884 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5415 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 46 945491863493 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12302 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5372 (C2) HDA temperature 22 47 21474836502 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 46 142522884 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 2140 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.4% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 51.3 Mixed 49.9 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.43 96% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 667, 667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 11 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16