Asus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 13:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 150
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 219
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 0939) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 8.19
8% 9.82 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 11.1
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC72205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 190 190 189 179 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.1% Average
Read 208
Write 190
Mixed 160
SusWrite 185
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 24.5
85% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 34.8
30% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 94%
Samsung SP2504C 239GB
186GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 66.1
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8945 GKH400UD25608-1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback