Asus N551JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus N551JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551JX
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 19:53
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 520
55% 431 Pts
64-Core 484
32% 484 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 177D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4259
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 55.6
17% 53.9 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 36.4
16% 42.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$269
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 504 504 501 498 496 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 133%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N551JX Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus N551JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback