Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3160 625 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 49.3 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 44.8 27% 38.8 Pts	4-Core 85.3 8-Core 87.9 12% 86.6 Pts	64-Core 88.1 6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0992) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4364 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.35 Parallax 2.81 2% 2.74 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 3.87 3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 302 268 279 281 276 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 459 Write 406 Mixed 359 SusWrite 298 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 28.7 100% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 123 102% 149 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	37x
Celeron J3160IntelBench 27%, 625 samples	10x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	47x

SSD
SA400S371920G 2TBKingstonBench 77%, 1,776 samples	2x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	20x
ACR16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 518 samples	9x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 21%, 6,087 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16