Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-A
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '20 at 18:37
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 114 2-Core 220 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 458 58% 442 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.9% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 106 Parallax 122 103% 118 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 129 Splatting 101 92% 113 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$33 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 63 45 51 39 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 331 Write 155 Mixed 238 SusWrite 53.7 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 15.9 42% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 14.7 59% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 93GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 62 57 75 77 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32% Below average	Read 45 Write 67.2 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 66.6 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial STK2400C15-8GBXMP 1x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.6 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	433x
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	196x
Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	156x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	130x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	57x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	44x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	54x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16