Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 04:17
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 866
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 351 357 352 350 346 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 476
Mixed 343
SusWrite 350
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 40.4
152% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 312
236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 110%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
630GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2207 2164 1471 1479 1482 1512 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,671
Write 2,070
Mixed 1,871
SusWrite 1719
466% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 96.5
322% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 881
662% 884 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
30GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 58 60 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 185
Write 61.5
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 58.8
22% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 31.4
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 65.2
50% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
507GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 82.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 65.8
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
903GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 130 132 129 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 131
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
389GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 98 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 100
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 185 174 176 179 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 177
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 179
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
294% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Generic- SD Card 32GB
26GB free, PID 0306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 44.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 11.6
16% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
130% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 38%
SanDisk SDSSDH3 1T02 1TB
539GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 236 236 235 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 240
Mixed 200
SusWrite 235
312% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 21.3
1,680% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 19.6
2,043% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 171%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 34.2
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback